an
ah. It was a experimental game. I didn't code it, only made the graphics, animation and character design. I don't think the coder added any special hidden featu
cin
QUOTE quotecThat's why you have EL to beat it for you! What... you don't make "gamemaker's privilege"? Some games have secrets that only hardcore addicts and the maker knows that makes the game easier...QuoteEndQuoteEEndIt reminds me of someone I know very, very well. *Laughs maniaca
chamomileess
An, this game has sucked away SO MUCH of my life, it's not even funny D:(in unrelated news) I got the 100x combo!(Unrelated news part deux) I noticed that the girl's skirt blends in with some of the sky, thus making it seem like she's ALREADY cut in half...(Unrelated news, LTD collector's Edition) I've found out that I've wasted probably five hours on this gam
chronosyndrome
..Why such things reminds 'bout Carmageddon not any other side-scrolling beat'em-ups ? Well, anyways: it's still was enjoyable, yet pretty silly game. At least An finally got some (basic) sense of dark humor. Aside from style, however, there are some very serious problem: repetitiveness. After 10 minutes I just got deadly bored of same environment, trap, victims and [b]especially[/d] those earth texture. Changing music (at least 3 tracks) would help too,
austriab
But yes, I find the fact that nobody thought of this bear very disappointing. Living in American ignorance.... talk about dumbing down America.... I think Sarah Palin will also know about that too, since she is the ultimate victim of one.You should ask George W. Bush he will tell you that you have penguins. o.O But yeah we are kind of ignorent and proud, and racist at times, and well ok we kinda suck at being nice. But hey, thats our thing /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />
rayce
QUOTE (timbits1o1 @ Dec 28 2009, 08:47 PM) quotecthere are no bears in asia except polar bears -.-QuoteEndQuoteEEndI'm not trying to be a jerk, but....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_bear
macfluffers
Not sure what timbits was thinking when he/she said t
timbits1o1
QUOTE (macfluffers @ Jul 15 2011, 07:09 AM) quotecAnd panda bears.Not sure what timbits was thinking when he/she said that.QuoteEndQuoteEEndRight, because pandas are actually bears. :/ Also,
patrickng9
Bear -> pandahmm maybe you are right /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif
joshyface
dalmatian?ALSO, tim thoughtquoteoQUOTE quotecpandas are actually more cat than bear, so they're technically not in the bear category.QuoteEndQuoteEEndThis is actually somewhat understandable: people debated that pandas are in the raccoon's family (which are kinda like cats) for the longest time. Although, that gene study was done in the 80's. BUT THEIR NAME IN CHINA, Da xiong mao, MEANS GREAT CAT BEAR. There are also the red pandas which look like cats, but are actually their own genus thingie.EDIT: I only know this because, I went on a panda obsession for about 5 months when I was 10. Also I had to check some facts to make sure they were correc
timbits1o1
QUOTE (Josh @ Jul 31 2011, 05:37 PM) quotecdo you mean dalmatian?ALSO, tim thoughtThis is actually somewhat understandable: people debated that pandas are in the raccoon's family (which are kinda like cats) for the longest time. Although, that gene study was done in the 80's. BUT THEIR NAME IN CHINA, Da xiong mao, MEANS GREAT CAT BEAR. There are also the red pandas which look like cats, but are actually their own genus thingie.EDIT: I only know this because, I went on a panda obsession for about 5 months when I was 10. Also I had to check some facts to make sure they were correct...QuoteEndQuoteEEndYeah misnomers happen, just like with a lot of the fish named trout that actually aren't trout. in any case, they are their own genus(or whatever magnitude of classification that bears are) right now so they still technically are not be
joshyface
GIANT PANDA BEARS are bears, red pandas are their own ge
macfluffers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_pandaquoteoQUOTE quotecFor many decades the precise taxonomic classification of the giant panda was under debate because it shares characteristics of both bears and raccoons. However, molecular studies suggest that the giant panda is a true bear and part of the Ursidae family, though it differentiated early in history from the main ursine stock. The giant panda's closest ursine relative is the spectacled bear of South America. The giant panda has been referred to as a living fossil.QuoteEndQuote
timbits1o1
QUOTE (macfluffers @ Aug 1 2011, 04:25 AM) quotechttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_pandaQuoteEndQuoteEEndCurses! Chinese education has lied to
patrickng9
orry for the ty
